Compliance intelligence

Every digital obligation. Owned.

LexVisual is the one workspace where lean legal, compliance, and product teams capture obligations in context, assign ownership, track progress, and produce the evidence to show it was done.

Built for
Privacy & data AI & automated systems Digital platforms Marketing & transparency Safety & governance
The real problem
Most compliance failures are not failures of legal understanding. They are failures of ownership.

This is the gap we kept seeing in practice. The obligations were known but nobody had made them operational inside the business. Nobody owned them. Nothing was tracked.

Lean teams have it worse. They face exactly the same regulatory surface as a large enterprise, but without the GRC infrastructure, the implementation project, or a dedicated team. LexVisual was designed for that reality.

01Read but not actioned. Updates land in inboxes. Nobody owns what needs to change.
02Known but not tracked. Obligations exist in memos and spreadsheets that go stale.
03Done but not evidenced. Work is completed but nothing is documented against the obligation.
Where it starts
You read something.
A law is mentioned.
Everything stops.

A stakeholder sends an article. A regulator publishes guidance. Buried inside it is a law, an obligation, a risk that might apply to you.

Then the real work starts. Not because the obligation is always relevant, often it is not. But someone has to find out. Someone has to stop, research the law, assess whether it applies, and explain what should happen next.

That is why LexVisual starts in the browser, at the source, not in a separate system you go back to later.
Live demo
Click any highlighted passage.
Watch it become an obligation.
The second passage is already tracked in the register. Watch what the panel shows instead.
ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_dma

Digital Markets Act: what platform obligations mean in practice

The DMA creates a new tier of obligations for designated gatekeepers — but its reach extends to any organisation that integrates with, builds on top of, or distributes through those platforms. Understanding which obligations apply to you is not always obvious.

You must provide a privacy notice at the time of collection, covering the identity of the controller, the purposes and legal basis for processing, how long data will be retained, and the rights of the individual.

For gatekeepers specifically, the Commission has also clarified the relationship between DMA obligations and the GDPR consent framework — particularly where data flows across services.

Gatekeepers must not combine personal data from the core platform service with data from any other service or third-party source without obtaining separate, valid GDPR consent. Users who do not consent must still be offered access to the service on equivalent terms.

Enforcement action is already underway. The Commission has opened non-compliance proceedings against several designated gatekeepers over exactly this provision.

Click a highlighted passage
LXV
Ready
Click any highlighted passage to identify the obligation from the verified library.
Matching obligation…
Mandatory
Applies to
Deadline
Sanctions exposure
Required action
Product walkthrough
From source text to audit trail.
One workflow.
Step 01
Operational inbox
Browser-captured obligations surface at the top, clearly separated. Bulk assign owners and set status across multiple items at once.
Team workflow
Step 02
Verified obligation workspace
Every obligation carries the full regulatory schema: type, applies-to, deadline, enforcement, and sanctions. Ask LexVisual for applicability guidance in context.
Verified library
Step 03
Gap analysis
Paste a policy document. The AI benchmarks it against your obligations and flags what is covered, partial, and missing. Push gaps directly to the inbox.
Benchmark
Step 04
Watchlist & regulatory feed
The watchlist is your early warning layer — developments pinned before they become obligations. The feed is what is happening now, from ICO, EDPB, Ofcom, FTC, and others. Pin anything relevant.
Monitor & track
Step 05
Compliance report
Generate a structured report from your live register: obligations by regulation, status, risk level, task completion, and evidence. The output a regulator or auditor would ask for first.
Audit trail
Step 06
AI-assisted research
No library match? Ask LexVisual to analyse the text directly. The result is clearly marked as an AI draft — not a verified obligation. Review it, add it to your inbox, or dismiss it.
AI draft, review required
LexVisual — Inbox
5 items
Inbox 5
All obligations
Baselines
Watchlist
Benchmark
Regulatory feed
Inbox 3 selected
3 selected
Assign owner
Principles of Processing
Art.5 · GDPR
Just captured
Transparency for AI systems
Art.50 · AI Act
Needs review
Transparency of advertising
Art.26 · DSA
In progress
Risk Assessment — Illegal Content
OSA Risk Assessment Duties
Needs review
LexVisual — AI Act · Art.50
Transparency for AI systems
Art.50 · AI Act
Needs review
Principles of Processing
Art.5 · GDPR
In progress
AI Act · Art.50
Transparency obligations for AI systems
High Risk
Type
Mandatory
Deadline
2 August 2026
Enforcement
National AI Authority
Sanctions
€15M or 3% turnover
What you need to do
⚡ Ask LexVisual
Benchmark
Policy document
Benchmark against
My obligations register
Benchmark against the full verified library
AI-assisted baseline
For regulations not yet in your register
Run analysis
Covered
GDPR Art.13 — Transparency notice present and adequate
Missing
AI Act Art.50 — No AI system disclosure found in policy
Partial
DSA Art.26 — Ad labelling referenced but incomplete
Missing
OSA Risk Assessment — Not addressed anywhere
Watchlist & regulatory feed
MONITOR Watchlist — pinned
OSA · Live
Ofcom Year 2 children's safety deadline
Risk assessment due May 2026.
AI Act · Upcoming
AI Act deployer obligations — Aug 2026
High-risk disclosure requirements incoming.
LIVE Regulatory feed
OFCOM enforcement
Ofcom sets 30 April deadline for major platforms
18 Mar 2026 · 📌 Pin to watchlist
EDPB privacy
EDPB opinion on pay-or-consent models
25 Mar 2026 · 📌 Pin to watchlist
Compliance report
This report was generated from your live obligations register.
8
Total
3
Open
2
In progress
3
Done
Privacy & data protection3 Done
AI & automated systemsIn progress
Digital platformsNeeds review
Save as PDF
Close
LXV
AI draft — review before saving
Does your business serve customers in the European U…
AI DRAFT — review before saving
Likely regulation
European Accessibility Act (EAA)
In plain terms
Businesses serving EU customers must comply with the EAA, focusing on digital accessibility, with enforcement beginning in June 2025.
What you need to do
Ensure digital services are accessible to individuals with disabilities in compliance with the EAA.
Coverage
As digitisation expands, so does the compliance surface around it.
LexVisual is built around the obligations a modern digital business keeps running into — organised by the situations that create them, not just by the laws that contain them. Each obligation has been reviewed by someone who has worked with it. Not scraped. Not summarised by AI. Editorial, not algorithmic.
Privacy & data protection
The obligation to collect, handle, and protect personal data lawfully. The foundational layer, everything else builds on it.
AI & automated decision-making
Transparency, human oversight, and documentation obligations for systems that make or assist decisions at scale.
Digital platforms & online services
Platform-specific obligations: content moderation, gatekeeper rules, illegal content, and marketplace accountability.
Marketing & user-facing transparency
What you must disclose to users about advertising, profiling, and how their data shapes what they see.
Safety, risk & governance
Risk assessment duties, safety by design requirements, and the documentation that regulators ask for first.
Compliance is never just one law.
A privacy question may also raise AI transparency obligations. A platform duty may intersect with marketing disclosure rules. A documentation requirement may matter across multiple frameworks at once. LexVisual is built to reflect those relationships — not flatten them into a list of separate laws. When you open an obligation, you see what it depends on, what it triggers, and what applies alongside it. The register thinks across regulations, not just within them.
Expertise
Not a database wrapped in a UI. A compliance workflow built by practitioners.

Our founder spent years working in regulatory compliance, reviewing obligations, advising teams, writing frameworks that then sat in folders and never got operationalised. The problem was never the law. It was always the same: no ownership, no tracking, no evidence trail.

Every obligation in the verified library has been reviewed for accuracy, applies-to conditions, enforcement context, and cross-regulatory relationships. Nothing is scraped. Nothing is published as verified unless a practitioner has read it.

The governance model
Verified library entries and AI-assisted drafts are intentionally distinct. That is what makes the product trustworthy.
Built from real compliance pain
Shaped by years of working inside regulatory compliance and seeing the same failure repeat. Not misunderstanding the law, but failing to operationalise it.
Designed to be used, not filed
A compliance tool that feels like enterprise IT from 2012 does not get used. LexVisual is designed to be calm, considered, and trustworthy. Something a legal team would show a client without embarrassment, and that a lean team without a compliance function would actually reach for.
Governed intelligence
Verified library entries and AI-assisted drafts look different in the product. That is the only honest way to build a tool that compliance teams can rely on in front of a regulator.
LexVisual
If you are building something for the digital economy, you have obligations. LexVisual makes sure they are owned.

Not another compliance database. Not another enterprise GRC suite. A workspace built for lean teams who need to move fast, stay rigorous, and have something to show for it.