LexVisual is the one workspace where lean legal, compliance, and product teams capture obligations in context, assign ownership, track progress, and produce the evidence to show it was done.
This is the gap we kept seeing in practice. The obligations were known but nobody had made them operational inside the business. Nobody owned them. Nothing was tracked.
Lean teams have it worse. They face exactly the same regulatory surface as a large enterprise, but without the GRC infrastructure, the implementation project, or a dedicated team. LexVisual was designed for that reality.
A stakeholder sends an article. A regulator publishes guidance. Buried inside it is a law, an obligation, a risk that might apply to you.
Then the real work starts. Not because the obligation is always relevant, often it is not. But someone has to find out. Someone has to stop, research the law, assess whether it applies, and explain what should happen next.
The DMA creates a new tier of obligations for designated gatekeepers — but its reach extends to any organisation that integrates with, builds on top of, or distributes through those platforms. Understanding which obligations apply to you is not always obvious.
You must provide a privacy notice at the time of collection, covering the identity of the controller, the purposes and legal basis for processing, how long data will be retained, and the rights of the individual.
For gatekeepers specifically, the Commission has also clarified the relationship between DMA obligations and the GDPR consent framework — particularly where data flows across services.
Gatekeepers must not combine personal data from the core platform service with data from any other service or third-party source without obtaining separate, valid GDPR consent. Users who do not consent must still be offered access to the service on equivalent terms.
Enforcement action is already underway. The Commission has opened non-compliance proceedings against several designated gatekeepers over exactly this provision.
Our founder spent years working in regulatory compliance, reviewing obligations, advising teams, writing frameworks that then sat in folders and never got operationalised. The problem was never the law. It was always the same: no ownership, no tracking, no evidence trail.
Every obligation in the verified library has been reviewed for accuracy, applies-to conditions, enforcement context, and cross-regulatory relationships. Nothing is scraped. Nothing is published as verified unless a practitioner has read it.
Not another compliance database. Not another enterprise GRC suite. A workspace built for lean teams who need to move fast, stay rigorous, and have something to show for it.